From the standpoint of the invisible Soul, the Self, there is neither form nor time nor space.+

The universe is not different from the invisible Soul, which is present in the form of consciousness, because the universe is made of consciousness. Consciousness alone is, and all else (the universe) is merely an illusion.

Thus, the illusion is not different from consciousness, which is the ultimate truth or Brahman or God in truth.

The invisible Soul or consciousness appears as the diverse universe is only an illusion. If it really became diverse, then the immortal would become mortal. The dualist thinkers who seek to prove the origination of the unborn, by that very enterprise, try to make the immortal mortal.

The ultimate nature can never change - the immortal can never become mortal and vice versa. "There's no plurality in the nature of the invisible Soul -" consciousness appears to be many”-"those who are attached to creation or production or origination are in ignorance because their approach is more practical, and they are stuck with the reality of the universe (waking) because they take it as real.

The dualist thinker's arguments are based on false self (ego) and false experience (waking state) to show the weakness of the position of the dualistic viewpoint. They are at their wits' end to explain.

No second thing exists other than the invisible Soul, which is the fullness of consciousness without the division of form, time, and space.

From the standpoint of the invisible Soul, there is neither form nor time nor space. Without the form, time, and space, the universe ceases to exist.

Without the universe, there is no creation, without the creation, there is no creator.

In reality, there is neither the creation nor the creator; only the invisible Soul alone exists as the ultimate reality.

Religion propagates the creator and the creation theory, hence people are forced to admit it.

People think that there must be a creator of this universe. If one thinks the Self is ‘I’ then there is a creator, but if one thinks the Self is the invisible Soul, which is present in the form of consciousness, then there is nothing exists other than consciousness.

If one objectifies and sees a universe, then he is bound to see many things besides himself and postulate a God, the creator.

You, your body, and the world in which you exist rise and set together from and into the invisible Soul or consciousness.

If God is apart from the invisible Soul, the Self, then God would be selfless, that is, outside existence, that is, non-existent.

No one has seen God creating the world. No one can claim that it was the first Knower of the first created things. How was that first ‘known’ substance generated?

There had to be at the very beginning of the creation, someone or other who was the very first knower of the creation. There cannot be something ‘known’ in the absence of a ‘knower.’

If at all, we said that there was a ‘Seen’ or ‘known’ substance produced at the beginning of creation, you may legitimately question us about its origin. But that has never been our argument.

We are consistent in our assertion that there has been no legitimate cause behind anything ‘seen’ at the beginning of creation or even later on at any time. Hence, there is no thing ‘seen.’ Because there has been no thing seen, consciousness is forever without bondage. Consciousness cannot be captured in words.

People are stuck believing in the creator and the creation theory; thus, they are stuck in the reality of the world in which they exist.: ~Santthosh Kumaar