The karmic account is never-ending because one has to be born again and again to reap his good or bad karma.+

Those Gurus who propagate Karma as the means to Self-realization belong to religion and yoga, not Spirituality or Adyathma.

When the Self is not the form but the Self is formless, then whose karma? The one that is born, lives, and dies is not the Self; then the question of karma does not arise.

You are the false self (ego) within the false experience (waking). Thus, whatever action and inaction, past, present, and future, belong to the waking experience, which is the dualistic illusion.

What happens to the dream entity that did good karma in the dream world, and it died and reincarnated in the next life, and suffered, but when waking takes place, the dream becomes unreal.

The waking becomes unreal when the waking entity (you) realizes the fact that it itself (you) is not the Self, but the Self is the Soul, which witnesses the coming and going of the three states in succession.

Thus, neither the karma of the waking entity nor the karma of the dream entity has meaning because the Self is neither the waking entity nor the Self is a dream entity, but the Self is the Soul or consciousness.

You are not the ‘Self’ because you are the birth entity; you are bound by form, time, and space, whereas the Self is birthless. Then, how does the karma theory have any meaning when the karma theory is based on the false ‘Self’ (birth entity) and false experience (world)?

The karma theory is a religious fable meant for the people who are fully immersed in the practical life and practical world, believing the experience of birth, life, death, and the world as reality. If the Self is birthless, then what values does the karma theory have, because it is based on birth, life, death, and rebirth?

Thus, as per my conviction, the Karma theory is merely a religious and yogic fable.

Yes, Ramana, J. Krishnamurti, and Nisargadatta all died of cancer-type illness. It does not make any difference if they died of cancer or not of cancer or any illness. Even Lord Krishna died a painful death. Death is a certain cause; the cause is irrelevant to a Gnani. When the Self is birthless, then it is deathless. A Gnani is unconcerned with death because he is fully aware that the illusion is only a passing show.

Thus, people’s painful death cannot be taken as evidence because the Soul, the Self, is ever deathless because it is unborn and eternal. After all, it is a formless, timeless, and spaceless existence.

The karmic account is never-ending because one has to be born again and again to reap their good or bad karma carried forward from one life to the next. To end his karmic account, he has to be born as a Muslim in his next birth because Islam does not believe in the karma theory. :~Santthosh Kumaar